Texas Personal Injury Verdicts & Landmark Cases

Texas’s proportionate-responsibility system and landmark verdicts shape every injury claim. These are the public decisions to understand.

You don’t have to be a lawyer to understand the decisions and verdicts that decide how Texas personal injury claims are won and lost. Below are real, publicly reported Texas cases — what happened, what they established, and why each matters to someone with a claim today.

Texas personal injury cases that shape your claim

Johnson v. Union Pacific RailroadHarris County jury · 2023

$557 million ($500M punitive; on appeal, subject to Texas’s punitive cap)

A woman struck by a train in downtown Houston lost a leg and fingers and suffered a severe brain injury. The jury found the railroad 80% responsible for ignoring its own safety rules and federal regulations, and the victim 20% responsible.

Why it matters to your case: Texas juries will impose massive punitive damages when a large company knowingly violates its own safety rules — and the proportionate-responsibility system applies even when the injured person bears some fault.

Source: Bloomberg Law — $557M Harris County verdict

Reavis v. Toyota Motor Corp.Dallas County jury · 2018 (affirmed 2021)

$242 million product-defect verdict (>$200M upheld on appeal)

A rear-end crash caused defectively designed front seats to collapse, slamming the parents’ heads into their two young children and causing permanent brain damage. A jury found the design defective and the maker grossly negligent; the appellate court upheld more than $200 million.

Why it matters to your case: Texas courts will hold manufacturers fully accountable for design defects that predictably cause catastrophic injury, and will sustain large punitive awards for conscious indifference to safety.

Source: PR Newswire — appellate affirmance

Farley v. MM Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975

529 S.W.2d 751 — the comparative-fault foundation

An injured ranch hand sued his employer, which argued he’d “assumed the risk” of dangerous work. The court abolished assumption of risk as a complete defense, folding it into Texas’s comparative-fault system — the framework now codified at CPRC § 33.001.

Why it matters to your case: Being partially at fault does not automatically defeat your claim in Texas — at 50% or less you still recover, reduced by your share. Defense lawyers push to get you past 51% precisely because that bars everything.

Source: Farley v. MM Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975)

These are publicly reported cases and general legal developments, provided for educational purposes only. They are not results obtained by Newman Injury Law, and past results do not predict the outcome of any case. Every claim depends on its own facts.

Hurt in a personal injury? Talk to a Texas injury lawyer.

Free consultation, 24/7. No fee unless we win. Time limits apply to Texas injury claims.